It’s a movement that lives largely online, rejects mainstream conservative politics, and is linked to nationalist and white supremacist sentiments. HILLARY CLINTON: All of this adds up to something we have never seen before. DONALD TRUMP (R), Presidential Nominee: When Democratic policies fail, they are left with only this one tired argument: You’re racist, you’re racist, you’re racist. What is alt-right, who’s behind it, where did it come from?
Now, of course, there’s always been a paranoid fringe in our politics, a lot of arising from racial resentment. DAVID WEIGEL, The Washington Post: Well, it’s a fairly young movement with fairly old ideas.
You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute in any way any material, including code and software, from the Service.
You may download material from the Service and may use the Service for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices.
As part of our Service, Our agrees to provide you with information and other computer services subject to these Terms of Service.
There is no dispute that the “girl” told Buttrick that she was underage, and there is no dispute that he crossed over the state line for the anticipated tryst. Buttrick's second argument is that the district court erred in denying his request for a jury instruction, drawn from an affirmative defense under the Model Penal Code, on abandonment or renunciation of intent to commit the crime. The facts recited come largely from Buttrick's testimony.
Buttrick never found his intended paramour; the Portsmouth police arrested him first. We hold that the claim of statutory unconstitutionality is meritless and devolves into nothing more than an insufficiency of evidence claim. § 2423(b), a question we do not address, the proffered instruction was properly rejected because it was an erroneous statement of the law. That testimony includes the evidence as to which the proposed instruction was directed and provides the basis for evaluating the claims that the statute was unconstitutionally applied.